You don’t need a pencil to write or do
you?
“As soon as they hit my class, they are
expected to sit down and write,” said one teacher of New Entrants. “Make sure your students know they are Writers
from day one, get them sitting down, with a pencil and get them writing in
their exercise book” said a person offering professional development. These statements seem sensible enough after
all that is what teachers do, they teach.
What are your thoughts?
I heard the statements, and I didn’t agree
with them.
Who
said humans were ready to write at the age of 5 years? Who said that the definition of writing
includes a pencil and paper? Who said that you had to sit down to write? Is
writing defined by a picture of something you did in the weekend and then a
sentence written by a teacher underneath?
Writing is about communicating ideas. Physically writing words down is one way we
can do this. Many of the students in
our learning community come to school without necessarily having used a
pencil. Consider the writing stages,
shown here in this link from https://www.kinderplans.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Writing-Stages.png.
There are many such examples if you goggle
them. My point is children don’t all
start school ready to write in books with a pencil.
Consider this approach. A group of children are interested in fire
fighting. Our teacher aide is a local
firefighter. He brings in helmets for
them to use in play. He talks to the
students about different situations he has been called to. He explains to them that after every call
out, the team sits down and records what has happened. The following day, another teacher walks
past this group. They are sitting around
a table. They yell out, “We are having a
meeting about our call out”. The teacher
says, “You will need something to record it in, and goes and gets a book”. One child takes charge, and starts to write
in the book. It doesn’t matter how she
writes, the point is writing it is now meaningful. Once students have ‘got writing’ and begin to
understand the power of it, further instruction can be given to the particular
skills needed to evolve their writing.
Some writers in our learning community haven’t
been exposed to story. Some find it
difficult to speak in sentences. We
believe that before a child can write, they need to speak or at least show
understanding of communication. What
would happen, if you arrived in a foreign country, and on your first day, the
tour guide said you were in charge of writing the request for breakfast, in the
foreign language! How would you feel?
Writing is about communicating. You will be
able to think of many cultures that have an oral tradition of passing down
stories. Are their stories any less
valuable? Of course not! Writing reflects the ideas, sequence and
logic of the writer. To communicate ideas that are important and rich orally
makes the writer no less an author than those who write with pencil and paper.
Of course we want all our students to be
able to write, it is very useful being able to record ideas even
essential. Lets face it, much of our
paranoia over students sitting down with a pencil, and writing from day dot, is
brought about by needing to met a summative assessment. That is expectations
that all children write at a certain level by a certain age. Having goals are important, but the goals must
be purposeful, meaningful and show progress.
What happened to meaningful learning that is not parroting someone
else’s ideas in a robot like fashion?
Would it not be more purposeful teaching
practice, to identify where the child is in their development of writing, and
design learning to meet this need?
Developmentally, the child may need to learn to draw first. They may need to be in an environment where
they hear words and are spoken to. The
achievement objectives of the New Zealand Curriculum say “a school’s curriculum
is likely to be well designed when – students are helped to build on existing
learning and take it to higher levels; –
the long view is taken: each student’s ultimate learning success is more
important than the covering of particular achievement objectives” (TKI, 2015).
I guess that is my real concern, that young children are being expected
to learn something before they are ready and in doing so we risk turning them off
learning.
Personally, I love walking into our
learning community and seeing groups of children, self managing themselves,
learning, some around white boards, writing, others with paper, drawing, others
playing in the family corner, designing some clothes for the doll on scrap
paper and still others on reading eggs on the ipad.
What do you think? How do your students travel with
writing? What is their existing learning
in writing? Are they successful
communicators of language?
Reference
TKI (2015) - http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/The-New-Zealand-Curriculum/The-school-curriculum-Design-and-review
Not only did the Reading Recovery and the other programs not help. I hated them! They made me feel stupid and different to the other kids.
ReplyDeleteThe Davis program was not like this. I am not sure why but it just seemed to make a lot more sense to me and was fun. Plus I got the whole day off school.